GST on PMS and AIF Fees in India: Rates, Charges and Investor Cost

GST on PMS and AIF fees in India

For investors using Portfolio Management Services (PMS) or Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs), the headline management fee is only one part of the total cost. GST on PMS and AIF fees can add a meaningful amount to management fees, performance-linked fees and other taxable service charges.

This becomes particularly important when comparing two investment structures. A quoted fee of 1.5% or 2% may look straightforward, but the actual amount paid can be higher once GST on PMS and AIF fees, brokerage, custody, transaction costs and other applicable charges are considered.

As of September 2026, financial and related services under Heading 9971 are generally subject to 18% GST, comprising 9% CGST + 9% SGST for intra-state supplies or 18% IGST for inter-state supplies, subject to the applicable place-of-supply and classification rules. CBIC specifically classifies portfolio management services, brokerage-related services and trust/custody services within Heading 9971. 

This guide explains GST on PMS and AIF fees, including GST on PMS fees, GST on AIF fees, management fees, performance fees, carried interest, brokerage, custody and input tax credit.

Important: Tax treatment can depend on the precise contractual structure, nature of service, recipient, supplier and transaction. Investors should verify the treatment applicable to their specific arrangement with a qualified tax professional.

What Is GST on AIF and PMS Fees?

GST on PMS and AIF fees is the Goods and Services Tax charged on taxable services supplied by portfolio managers, investment managers and other service providers.

The underlying securities themselves are not treated as goods or services under GST. However, the services connected with managing, advising, administering or transacting in investments can be taxable. CBIC specifically states that securities are outside the definition of goods and services, while separately charged service fees can attract GST. 

For PMS, the relevant service can include portfolio management, investment management and related advisory activities. CBIC's service classification expressly includes portfolio management services except pension funds under SAC 997153. 

For AIFs, the GST treatment generally relates to the service supplied by the investment manager to the AIF. The GST Council has specifically considered the question of GST on AIF investment-management fees and recorded that fund-management services supplied to an Indian AIF are taxable at 18%. 

Therefore, GST on PMS and AIF fees should generally be treated as a cost associated with the service component rather than a tax on the securities purchased by the investor.

Is GST Applicable on PMS Management Fees?

Yes. GST on PMS management fees is generally charged at 18% when the PMS provider supplies taxable portfolio management services.

For example, assume:

  • PMS management fee = ₹1,00,000
  • GST @ 18% = ₹18,000
  • Total fee payable = ₹1,18,000

Therefore, an investor should not automatically treat a quoted 1% or 2% PMS fee as the final cost.

The SEBI framework requires the PMS agreement and disclosure documents to specify the quantum and manner of payment of fees and charges for services provided by the portfolio manager.
Watch the video below to understand PMS fees, management charges, performance fees and the overall cost of investing through PMS.

This is why investors should check whether the quoted fee is inclusive or exclusive of GST.

The distinction is important because GST on PMS and AIF fees can materially change the effective cost.

Is GST Charged on PMS Performance Fees?

Generally, GST on PMS performance fees applies where the performance-linked amount represents consideration for the portfolio management service.

PMS agreements may use a fixed fee, return-based fee or a combination of both. SEBI's framework permits portfolio managers to charge agreed fixed or return-based fees, subject to the applicable disclosures and client permissions.

For example, suppose:

  • Performance fee = ₹2,00,000
  • GST @ 18% = ₹36,000
  • Total performance-related payment = ₹2,36,000

The important point is that the performance fee and GST should be analysed separately.

GST on PMS and AIF fees does not mean GST is charged on the investor's entire portfolio value. It is generally applied to the taxable service consideration.

Investors should also examine:

  • hurdle rate;
  • high-water mark;
  • performance-fee calculation;
  • crystallisation frequency;
  • whether the fee is calculated before or after certain expenses; and
  • whether GST is additional to the quoted fee.

Is GST Applicable on AIF Management Fees?

Yes. GST on AIF management fees is generally applicable to investment-management services supplied to an Indian AIF.

The GST Council has specifically recorded that management of a fund, including an AIF, is a taxable service and that the applicable tax is 18% on the management fee. 

For example, if an AIF's investment manager charges a management fee of ₹1 crore:

  • Management fee = ₹1,00,00,000
  • GST @ 18% = ₹18,00,000
  • Total = ₹1,18,00,000

The economic impact can ultimately be borne by the fund and, depending on the fund structure, flow through to investors.

This is why GST should be included when evaluating the full AIF fees and charges of a fund.

The SEBI AIF framework also requires appropriate disclosure of fund-related terms and expenses. SEBI's current AIF Master Circular was issued on June 3, 2026.

Is GST Charged on AIF Performance Fees or Carried Interest?

This requires more careful analysis.

GST on AIF performance fees depends on the legal and contractual character of the payment.

A conventional performance fee paid to an investment manager for investment-management services can represent consideration for a taxable service and may therefore attract GST.

GST on carried interest, however, is more nuanced.

SEBI's AIF framework recognises arrangements where returns or profits may be shared with the manager or sponsor, including amounts described as carried interest or additional return. 

The GST treatment of carry depends on how the arrangement is legally structured. If the amount represents consideration for a taxable management service, GST analysis may differ from a situation where the manager or sponsor receives returns in its capacity as an investor in securities or AIF units.

Indian tax commentary also notes that there is no single specific GST provision expressly determining the treatment of every carried-interest arrangement and that characterisation depends on the facts and structure. 

Accordingly, investors should not automatically assume that every amount labelled "carry" has identical GST treatment.

This is one area where GST on PMS and AIF fees requires contractual and tax review rather than relying solely on the name of the charge.

What Other AIF and PMS Charges May Attract GST?

Different charges can have different tax treatment depending on whether they represent taxable services and who supplies them.

Charge Typical nature GST consideration
PMS management fee Portfolio management service Generally taxable
PMS performance fee Performance-linked management consideration Generally taxable when consideration for service
AIF management fee Investment/fund management service Generally taxable at 18% for Indian AIF arrangements
AIF performance fee Performance-linked manager compensation Depends on contractual characterisation
Carried interest Return/profit allocation or manager compensation Structure-specific analysis required
Investment advisory fee Advisory service Generally taxable
Brokerage Brokerage/securities service Service charge generally taxable
Custody charges Custody/depository-related service Generally taxable service
Accounting/fund administration Administrative service Generally taxable
Audit/professional fees Professional service Generally taxable where supplied by a registered taxable supplier
Securities transaction itself Transfer of securities Securities themselves are outside GST

CBIC expressly classifies brokerage and related securities services, portfolio management services and trust/custody services under Heading 9971. 

This distinction is important because GST on brokerage and custody charges does not mean GST is imposed on the value of the shares or securities being bought or sold.

The GST generally relates to the separately charged service.

Can Investors Claim Input Tax Credit on Investment Fees?

Whether GST paid on investment-related fees can be claimed as input tax credit depends heavily on the investor's status and use of the service.

Individual investors

For a normal individual investing personal funds through PMS or AIFs, input tax credit on the GST paid on investment fees is generally not available merely because GST has been charged.

GST input tax credit is fundamentally connected with the requirements applicable to a registered person and use of goods or services in the course or furtherance of business.

Therefore, a personal investor should not assume that GST paid on GST on PMS and AIF fees can be recovered through an ITC claim.

Company and LLP investors

A company or LLP that is registered under GST may potentially claim eligible input tax credit where the relevant service is used in the course or furtherance of its taxable business, subject to the CGST Act and restrictions.

However, simply holding investments does not automatically establish eligibility for ITC.

The CGST framework restricts credit attributable to exempt supplies and contains specific conditions and restrictions. 

Therefore, companies and LLPs should evaluate the exact activity generating taxable output supplies before claiming credit for GST on investment management fees.

Trusts and family offices

Trusts and family offices require a facts-based assessment.

Their GST registration status, business activities, nature of investments, taxable supplies and the precise relationship with the PMS/AIF manager can affect the answer.

The safest approach is to maintain a clear GST and accounting trail and obtain professional advice before treating GST on PMS and AIF fees as recoverable ITC.

How Does GST Affect the Total Cost of PMS or AIF Investment?

A simple illustration shows the effect.

Suppose a PMS charges:

  • Portfolio value: ₹1 crore
  • Management fee: 2% = ₹2,00,000
  • Performance fee: ₹1,00,000
  • Total taxable fees: ₹3,00,000
  • GST @ 18%: ₹54,000
  • Total fees including GST: ₹3,54,000

Here, GST on PMS and AIF fees adds ₹54,000 to the service cost.

The effective cost is therefore not simply 3%.

It becomes ₹3.54 lakh on a ₹1 crore portfolio, before considering other applicable charges.

A similar calculation can be performed for AIFs.

Suppose:

  • AIF management fee = ₹5 lakh
  • Other taxable manager/service fees = ₹1 lakh
  • Total taxable service fees = ₹6 lakh
  • GST @ 18% = ₹1.08 lakh

The total becomes ₹7.08 lakh.

This illustrates why investors should compare the total expense structure, rather than comparing only the headline management fee.

GST vs Capital Gains Tax on Investment Returns

GST and capital gains tax operate differently.

GST on PMS and AIF fees relates primarily to taxable services supplied to the investor, fund or relevant entity.

Capital gains tax, on the other hand, applies to taxable gains arising from the transfer of capital assets, subject to the applicable provisions of the Income-tax Act.

For specified listed securities where Section 111A applies, the Income Tax Department currently states a 20% STCG rate for transfers on or after July 23, 2024, subject to the relevant conditions. For specified listed securities under Section 112A, LTCG is currently taxed at 12.5% on gains exceeding ₹1.25 lakh, subject to the applicable conditions. 

Therefore:

GST = tax associated with taxable services

Capital gains tax = tax associated with taxable investment gains

They should not be treated as substitutes for each other.

Also remember that the actual capital-gains treatment for AIF investments can differ depending on the category of AIF, nature of income, pass-through provisions and investor circumstances.

How Should Investors Account for GST on Investment Fees?

Investors should maintain a clear record of:

  1. Original fee amount.
  2. GST amount.
  3. Total amount debited.
  4. Date of invoice.
  5. Nature of service.
  6. GSTIN of the service provider.
  7. Relevant tax invoice.
  8. Whether the fee relates to management, performance, advisory, custody or another service.

A properly maintained PMS fee invoice can make reconciliation easier.

Similarly, an AIF fee invoice or statement should clearly identify the underlying charge and applicable GST where relevant.

For investors using multiple managers or funds, keeping these records separately can simplify year-end accounting and tax review.

What Should Investors Check in a PMS or AIF Fee Agreement?

Before investing, review the fee section carefully.

1. Is GST included or extra?

A fee quoted as "2%" can mean either:

  • 2% including GST; or
  • 2% plus GST.

These produce different total costs.

2. How is the management fee calculated?

Check whether it is based on:

  • opening AUM;
  • average AUM;
  • daily AUM;
  • committed capital;
  • invested capital; or
  • another methodology.

3. How is the performance fee calculated?

Check:

  • hurdle;
  • benchmark;
  • high-water mark;
  • catch-up;
  • crystallisation period;
  • loss adjustment.

4. What other expenses are passed through?

Check for:

  • brokerage;
  • custody;
  • audit;
  • fund accounting;
  • administration;
  • legal expenses;
  • transaction costs;
  • depository charges.

SEBI's PMS disclosure framework specifically addresses the quantum and manner of fees and charges, including investment management, advisory, transfer and transaction costs such as brokerage and custody. 

5. What does the invoice show?

Check whether the PMS fee invoice or AIF fee invoice separately identifies the taxable value and GST.

This can make it easier to verify GST on PMS and AIF fees and reconcile the amount actually charged.

Final Takeaway

GST on PMS and AIF fees is an important part of understanding the real cost of alternative investments.

For PMS investors, GST on PMS fees, GST on PMS management fees, GST on PMS performance fees, brokerage and custody-related service charges can all affect the final amount paid.

For AIF investors, GST on AIF fees, GST on AIF management fees, performance-linked compensation and potentially GST on carried interest require attention to the legal structure and contractual terms.

The most useful checklist is simple:

Headline fee → GST → performance fee → brokerage → custody → other expenses → tax impact → net investor cost.

At ALTPORT, we believe investors should understand the complete cost structure before evaluating any alternative investment opportunity. Looking only at expected returns without examining fees and taxes can leave an incomplete picture.

Want to understand PMS and AIF opportunities, fee structures and alternative-investment strategies? Connect with ALTPORT and explore the investment landscape with greater clarity.

Disclaimer

For educational purposes only; not investment advice. Tax laws, GST provisions and investment regulations may change and their application depends on the facts and structure of each transaction. Investors should consult their tax advisor, chartered accountant or other qualified professional before making investment or tax decisions.
ARN-171040 | APRN00074

Section: Help & Support
Frequently Asked Questions

Find answers to common questions about fund investments, performance, portfolio strategy, and investor services.

Generally, yes, where the performance fee represents consideration for taxable PMS services. The precise treatment should be checked against the PMS agreement and applicable GST rules.

Yes. GST on AIF management fees supplied by an investment manager to an Indian AIF is generally charged at 18%, subject to the applicable facts and tax rules. The GST Council has specifically recorded this treatment.

It can be, depending on whether the payment represents consideration for taxable management services. The contractual structure should be reviewed.

GST does not directly tax the investment return. However, GST on PMS and AIF fees increases the cost paid for taxable services and can therefore reduce the investor's net outcome compared with a scenario without that cost.

Generally, taxable investment-management services supplied for consideration attract GST at the applicable rate. Heading 9971 covers financial and related services, with the general rate for relevant financial services being 18%.

The general applicable rate is 18% for taxable PMS services, subject to the specific classification and place-of-supply rules.

For investment-management services provided to an Indian AIF, the applicable rate is generally 18%.

It depends on the legal and economic character of the carried-interest arrangement. Carry structured as a return on securities may require different analysis from consideration paid for a taxable management service. Professional tax advice is recommended for specific structures.

Not necessarily. Some PMS providers quote fees exclusive of GST, while the agreement may specify an inclusive structure. Always check the fee schedule and invoice. Current PMS disclosures can expressly state that fees are exclusive of 18% GST.

The underlying securities transaction is outside GST, but brokerage and custody are separately supplied services. CBIC classifies brokerage-related securities services and trust/custody services under Heading 9971.

A personal investor generally cannot claim ITC simply because GST has been paid. ITC eligibility depends on GST registration, business use and the statutory conditions and restrictions.

A PMS fee invoice should allow the investor to identify the taxable service value and applicable GST. Investors should retain invoices and statements for their records.

Yes, fund-management services supplied to an Indian AIF are generally taxable. The GST Council has specifically discussed the 18% treatment of AIF investment-management services.

Generally, investment advisory services supplied for consideration are taxable services. The exact treatment depends on the nature of the service and applicable GST provisions.

NRI arrangements require additional analysis because GST treatment can depend on the supplier, recipient, place of supply, nature of service and whether the transaction qualifies as an export of service or another special treatment. CBIC identifies asset management, portfolio management, fund management and advisory services among financial services for which place-of-supply rules can be relevant.